ANALYSIS OF THE DEGRADATION OF OLIGONUCLEOTIDE STRANDS DURING THE FREEZING/THAWING PROCESSES USING MALDI-MS

 

 

Analytical Chemistry, Volume 72, Number 20, Pages 5092-5096

 

 

ABSTRACT

Synthetic oligonucleotide strands ranging from 5-25 units in length are commonly used as standards, probes and templates in various bioanalytical applications.  Until recently their preparation, storage and handling were regarded as unimportant but this work provides valuable information to the contrary.   The systematic degradation of oligonucleotide strands during sample preparation is investigated by repeatedly freezing/thawing short strands followed by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Mass Spectrometric (MALDI-MS) analysis.  It is shown here that the longevity of an oligonucleotide strand is dependent on several factors including base composition, solution concentrations, strand length as well as thawing conditions. 

Several trends in strand robustness were established. Our studies reveal that the robustness of strands is base dependent T-mer>A-mer>C-mer>G-mer.  Likewise, an increase in the length of the strands increases the tendency of a sample to degrade.  Another observation included that samples of mixed bases degrade according to structural conformations.  All of these observations are attributed to the fact that the samples undergo degradation during sample/solvent isolation during freezing.


INTRODUCTION

The evolution of MALDI-MS has spurred on its application as a technique for the detection, analysis and quantification of synthetic oligonucleotide strands, which are often used as standards, chemical sensors, templates, probes and even drugs.1-5  As a result much work has been done to improve MALDI-MS analysis including the optimization of instrumental/tuning parameters,6-7  the discovery of new matrices such as ATT,8-10 as well as the investigation of sensitivity enhancers.11 Fortunately this fundamental work has permitted the extension of MALDI analysis to even more complicated systems such as oligonucleotide metabolites12 PCR products13 and single-nucleotide polymorphisms.14  In addition the technique has been elevated to include sequencing work through enzymatic digestion15,16 or energetic dissociation.17-19  

Despite all of these advances in oligonucleotide detection by MALDI few investigative studies have been performed on the solution handling process prior to analysis. The questions arise. What are the detrimental effects resulting from the everyday storage and handling conditions of typical strands? Are extra precautions required for different strands? Unfortunately, several researchers have already noted the degradation of these commercial samples as a result of time, storage conditions or the repetitiveness of the freezing/thawing process.20-21  For example, Anchordoquy et al.20 noted that the fast freezing/thawing cycle was more damaging to a lipid/DNA complex than a slow freezing/thawing process.  This observation of a typical drug delivery system was not only informative but also cost effective for the drug manufacturer involved.  

Since it is not always possible to store oligos under ideal conditions (-20C, pH>6) the repetitive freezing/thawing of an oligonucleotide strand can lead to the undesirable decomposition of a sample through the loss of a terminal phosphate group, a base or the entire oligonucleotide unit.  This observation relates to the fact that during the freezing/thawing process the oligonucleotide and buffer components isolate from the solvent system.  As a result this isolation increases the percentage of similar intermolecular attractions and bond breakages. 

To our knowledge no comparative study exists which evaluates the fundamental ruggedness of various oligonucleotides strands.  Therefore, this work represents a systematic analysis to distinguish the robustness of various oligonucleotide samples. Degradation results are presented as a function of oligonucleotide base composition, concentration, length and freezing/thawing conditions. The MALDI analysis of constant base 5-mers (5¢ AAA AA 3¢, 5¢ CCC CC 3¢ etc.) as well as various strands are analyzed for their durability during several repetitive freezing/thawing cycles. The freezing/thawing rates are also studied by applying two methods: slow freezing at 0C or rapid freezing by placing the sample in liquid nitrogen.

MALDI-MS lends itself as an excellent technique for this analysis due to its efficient and effective sample preparation. In comparison to the traditional native gel electrophoresis analysis, which often requires hours to days for completion, MALDI only requires minutes from sample preparation to data collection. This factor is a definite advantage for a freezing/thawing study because during the cycling process, hundreds of samples need to be analyzed rapidly.  The one drawback of MALDI analysis is the possibility of fragmentation during the ionization/desorption process. However, the previous work by Pomerantz et al. has illustrated that the decomposition of oligo strands during the MALDI event increases with molecular weight.22 Therefore, to avoid this complication samples of relatively short length (5-mers to 12-mers) were intentionally chosen to ensure the absence of degradation products from the ionization/desorption process.

 

EXPERIMENTAL

Systematic Degradation of Oligonucleotides

All oligonucleotides (Midland Certified Reagent Company-Midland, TX) were dissolved in Millipure water to yield the appropriate concentrations ranging from 1-50M.  From each prepared solution 100 L was transferred into a 1.5-mL centrifuge tube. The oligonucleotide solutions were then repeatedly frozen/thawed by one of the following techniques: during the first procedure, which tested the robustness of the sample strands under stressed situations, the solutions were frozen in liquid N2 for 1 minute and then thawed in water bath (65°C) for 5 minutes.  The second technique provided a comparison of typical, everyday laboratory conditions to our simulated, accelerated conditions.  This method was performed under the following less harsh environment. The samples were frozen in laboratory freezer (0°C) for 5 hours.  Followed by thawing on the laboratory bench top (31°C) for 1 hour. 

After ten freezing/thawing cycles 1 L of sample was aliquoted from the centrifuge tube and prepared for MALDI analysis. Thawing caused during shipping or from the daily freezer removal was not included as part of cycling process since their effects are considered minimal.  Each sample was repeated in triplicate to ensure reproducibility.

Acquisition of MALDI Spectra

All spectra were acquired on the PerSeptive Biosystems Voyager-DE Biospectrometry Workstation (Framingham, MA) The instrumental conditions were as follows: linear mode and negative ion detection.  In this mode a negative 20,000-acceleration voltage is used with the delayed extraction option activated at 50 ns.

After every ten freezing/thawing cycles 1L of sample was removed from the centrifuge tube and mixed with the appropriate matrix. The 10-mg/ml solution of the matrix 6-aza-2-thiothymine  (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) was prepared daily in 50/50 solution of acetonitrile and 0.1M ammonium citrate.  ATT was chosen for this study since it is the established matrix for short oligonucleotide analysis.22  Matrix and analyte solutions were spotted on the MALDI sample stage in a 2:1 ratio (2L of matrix to 1L of analyte) and allowed to air dry.  After visual inspection a water wash was performed on the MALDI spot to remove excess salt when necessary.23 All spectra were acquired by averaging 100 shots acquired by rastering across the sample spot.  Data was analyzed using the software program Grams 386.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Influence of Base Composition on Decomposition

Figure 1 represents the decomposition of 5AAA AA 3 after undergoing 0, 20 and 70 repetitive freezing/thawing cycles respectively. After this process the samples exhibited decomposition peaks (labeled in the figures as “*”) as a result of 1) the loss of the terminal phosphate group 2) the loss of a base or 3) the loss of a complete oligonucleotide unit. Initially each sample was prepared and analyzed directly after receipt from the vendor and prior to the freeze/thaw cycling (cycle=0) This is an important step in the procedure because it determined the threshold energy of the laser irradiance and also established the absence of failure sequences as an undesirable residual product of the oligonucleotide synthesis. Once determined the laser irradiation was not deviated therefore the possibility of ion production from prompt fragmentation was discounted.

The comparison of Figures 1 and 2 illustrates the degradation of two separate 5-mers of different base compositions (5 AAA AA 3 versus 5 TTT TT 3).  The observed trend indicates that the adenosine (A) sections of the oligo strands are more susceptible to decomposition than the thymidine (T) sections of a strand. In general, the breakdown of the A-mer is evident after only twenty freeze/thaw cycles.  It is interesting to note the immediate decomposition of the A-mer during the first 20 cycles followed by very little degradation during the following 50 cycles.  This observation indicates a trend for the decomposition to occur during an early phase of the freezing/thawing cycling.  In contrast, the T sections are not susceptible to decomposition, even after 70 cycles

Table 1 lists the oligo sequences used in this section of the study as well the percentage of strand intact after various cycling periods.  This value serves as a robustness measurement for the various 5-mer strands as illustrated in equation 1:

% Intact = (molecular + decomposition ions/molecular ion)n cycles x 100   (1)

It is important to measure the decomposition peaks relative to the molecular ion since previous work has proven an influence of base composition on mass spectrometric detection as a result of ionization efficiency.24  Note that the overall trend established from this data was that the robustness of T-mer>A-mer>C-mer>G-mer.  This observation is attributed to the interaction of each of these strands as it undergoes isolation from the aqueous solvent system.  This relationship follows the tendency for the various available sites in the strand to undergo hydrogen bonding characteristic of helical duplexation, intermolecular or intramolecular bonding. More specifically the adenine-thymidine base pair experiences hydrogen bonding at two sites whereas the guanine-cytosine base pair undergoes bonding at three sites.  The larger the number of hydrogen bonds cites a sample contains the greater the decomposition it experiences.  

            It is interesting to note that this trend does not resemble the independently established trend of ionization efficiency for nucleic acid bases as they undergoes mass spectrometric desorption ionization. Typically, the loss of the nucleic acid base is the primary fragmentation reaction that occurs during the ionization process. During this process it has been suggested that the N-glycosyl bond is weaker for the purine nucleotides than for the pyrimidine nucleotides resulting in an overall trend of stability to be (A, G>C>>T) This ionization/desorption trend is contrary to our results and allows us to conclude that our observations are strictly dependent on the solution chemistry and not a reflection of the desorption/ ionization process.

The ruggedness of bases under freezing/thawing conditions (T-mer>A-mer>C-mer>G-mer) however shows some similarities to the trend of bases to withstand cleavage from the backbone in an acidic medium due to hydrolysis of the N-glycosyl linkage (T>>C>G, A). Since our medium was neutral, this was not a detrimental consideration.  To address the issue of which trend is more detrimental to an oligonucleotide strand (freezing/thawing versus acidic medium) future studies could be conducted in a more acidic medium and analyzed.

 

Influence of Solution Concentration on Decomposition

The samples 5 AAA AA 3 and 5 CCC CC 3 were chosen to represent a pyrimidine and purine while conducting the study on concentration dependence.  Figure 3 shows the decomposition of the 5 AAA AA 3 as a) 50µM solution and b) 1 µM solution after 20 harsh cycles.  The general trend demonstrates that the lower the oligomer concentration, the more susceptible a short strand is to decomposition. For example, after 70 cycles the 50M A-mer is 46% intact whereas the 1M sample is only 23% intact. (Spectra are not shown).  The C-mer exhibits a similar trend with a 21% percent intact value after 50 cycles and a 19% intact value after 70 cycles. 

The results from this section of the study lead to the conclusion that the analyte is undergoing a separation and isolation from the remainder of the solvent system while freezing. It also supports that fact that degradation is caused during this isolation process.  As the analyte begins to isolate together, the more concentrated (50M) solution has a larger component of the oligonucleotide aggregating together than the 1µM solution. Therefore, the detrimental influence of the solvent system is smaller for the 50µM sample than for the 1µM sample. Since the lower concentration (1µM) has a larger solvent: analyte ratio the harmful effects of the solvent system are more pronounced at the lower concentration. No significant difference are noted for the purine versus pyrimidine dependence on concentration since the A-mer and C-mer appear to degrade equally as quickly at lower concentrations.  All of this information can prove is valuable to researchers who store oligonucleotide strands as standards: short strands are best stored at low concentrations.

Figure 4 illustrates the effect of repetitive freezing/thawing on larger mixed base strands at various concentrations. This figure shows the sample 5 GGG GGA AAA A 3 as it quickly degrades to less than 4% after 20 cycles at the 50 M sample (Figure 4a).  Fifty cycles of freezing and thawing are required for similar results on the 1M sample (Figure 4b).  Although this tendency differs from the conclusions drawn in Figure 3 the observation is attributed to the mixed base composition and increased length of the strand.  The more complex structure causes steric hindrance and prevents the efficient aggregation in the solvent system, thereby allowing the detrimental effects of the solvent system to prevail. 

Influence of Strand Length on Decomposition

The spectra displayed in Figure 5 demonstrate the influence of strand length on the decomposition of a thymidine region of an oligonucleotide strand and Table 2 provides the experimental calculations.   The overall trend that is revealed from these studies follows the basis that as oligonucleotide length increases the likelihood of its degradation during freezing/thawing also increases. To illustrate this Figure 5a shows that after 90 cycles, the 5-mer experienced little degradation (only 2%) unlike the 12-mer of the same makeup that fragmented to 40% of its original value.  This observation is attributed to the increased number of hydrogen bonding interactions that occur for a longer strand and supports the conclusions drawn from Figure 4.  In analyzing these results it becomes apparent that the length is equally as important as base composition in determining the robustness of a sample.

 

 

Influence of Mixed Bases on Decomposition

All of the 12-mers presented in Figure 6 consist of longer strands of mixed bases (20µM) that have undergone 50 freezing/thawing cycles.  From Figure 6c we notice that the TC-mer did not decomposed.  Unexpectedly, the GA-mer degraded more than the GC-mer, which violated the trend, established from the base composition studies (Table 1.) This observation, however, is explained by the fact that the GC-mer is self-complimentary and is undergoing a structural conformation that makes it more effective in shielding itself from hydrogen bonding interactions within the solvent system.     

Comparison of Unusual Freezing/Thawing to Routine Handling

Most synthetic samples do not experience the unusual freezing/thawing conditions (Liquid N2/65C) that our samples experienced.  Therefore, a comparison study of freezing thawing rates was performed to compare our results with average conditions (freezer/countertop) and is shown in Figure 7.  In comparison, the laboratory bench/freezer approach yielded results similar to our liquid nitrogen method.  The results of leaving the sample on the bench top and returning it to the freezer 8 times over a 40 hour period (2.5 hours in the freezer: 2.5 hours on the benchtop) yielded a 55% intact strand.  By referring to Table 1 a similar result would be obtained at approximately 50 cycles under the liquid nitrogen conditions.  Therefore, the slower freezing and thawing performed in typical laboratory setting is more harmful to the oligonucleotide samples than our simulated conditions.

 

CONCLUSIONS

                The robustness of several oligonucleotide strands was analyzed during simulated freezing/thawing processes.  The results indicated that the characteristic robustness of a strand was dependent on base composition (T-mers>A-mers>C-mers>G-mers) as well as length (5-mers were more sturdy than 12-mers for the T-mer strands).  Concentration was another consideration, which was illustrated to be influential since a 50-µM concentration of the 5¢ AAA AA 3¢ solution illustrated less decomposition than a 1 M solution.  Experiments were also performed to compare typical laboratory conditions to our unusual freezing/thawing conditions.

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by a grant from the Office of the Vice-President for Academic Affairs at University of the Sciences in Philadelphia.  We also thank Dr. Michael Nedved and Dr. Mark Plucinsky of Johnson & Johnson for their generous assistance and instrument time.


REFERENCES

 

(1)  Chen, X.; Fei, Z.; Smith, L.M.; Bradbury, E.M.; Majidi, V. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71,     

      3118-3125.

(2) Boncheva, M.; Scheibler, L.; Lincoln, P.; Vogel, H.; Akerman, B. Langmuir. 1999,

      15, 4317-4320.

(3) Albagli, D.; Van Atta, R.; Cheng, P.; Huan, B.; Wood, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,         

      121, 6954-6955.      

(4) Altman, R.K.; Schwope, I.; Sarracino, D.A.; Tetzlaff, C.N.; Bleczinski, C.F.; Richert,

     C. J. Comb. Chem. 1999, 1, 493-508.

(5) Trabesinger, W.; Schultz, G. J.; Gruber, H. J.; Schindler, H.; Schmidt, T. Anal. Chem. 

      1999, 71, 279-283.

(6) Saurina, J.; Hernandez-Cassou, S.; Tauler, R.; Izquierdo-Ridorsa, A. Anal. Chem.

      1999, 71, 126-134.

(7) Little, D.P.; Cornish, T.J.; O’Donnell, M.J.; Braun, A.; Cotter, R.J.; Koster, H. Anal.

     Chem. 1997, 69, 4540-4546.

(8) Juhasz, P.; Roskey, M. T.; Smirnov, I. P.; Haff, L.A.; Vestal, M. L.; Martin, S. A.

     Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 941-946.

(9) Tang, W.; Nelson, C.N.; Zhu, L.; Smith, L. M. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1997, 8,

      218-224.

(10) Thiede, B.; Von Janta-Lipinski, M. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 12, 1889-

        94.

(11) Simmons, T. A.; Limbach, P. A. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1997, 11, 567-

        572.

(12) Muddiman, D. C.; Cheng, X.; Udseth, H.R.; Smith, R. D. J. Am. Soc. Mass

        Spectrom. 1996, 7, 697-706.

(13) Apffel, A.; Chakel, J. A.; Fischer, S.; Lichtenwalter, K.; Hancock, W. S. Anal Chem.

        1997, 69, 1320-1325.

(14) Doktycq, J.; Hurst, G. B.; Goudarzi, S.; McLuckey, S.A.; Tang, K.; Chen, H.; Usiel,

       M.; Jacobson, K.B.; Woychik, R.P.; Buchanan, M.V. Anal Biochem. 1995, 230, 205-  

       214.

(15) Haff, L.A.; Smirnov, I. P. Genome Res. 1997, 7, 378-388.

(16) Smirnov, I. P.; Roskey, M.T.; Juhasz, P.; Takach, E. J.; Martin, S.A.; and Haff,L.A.

       Anal. Biochem. 1996,  238, 19-25.

(17) Bentzley, C. M.; Johnston, M.V.; Larsen, B.S.; Gutteridge, S. Analytical Chemistry,      

        1996, 68, 2141-2146.

(18) Murray, K. K. J. Mass Spectrom. 1996, 31, 1203-1215.

(19) Limbach, P. A. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 1996, 15, 297-336.

(20) Kirpekar, F.; Nordhoff, E.; Larsen, L.K.; Kristiansen,K.; Roepstorff , P.; 

       Hillenkamp, F. Nucliec Acids Research. 1998, 26, 2554-2559.

(21) Bentzley, C. M.; Johnston, M.V.; Larsen, B.S. Anal Biochem, 1998, 258, 31-37.

(22) Anchordoquy, T.; Girouard, L.; Carpenter, J.; Kroll, D.  Journal of Pharm. Sciences

      1998, 87, 1046-1051.

(23) Bartolini, W.; Bentzley, C.M.; Johnston, M.V.; Larsen, B.S. J. Am. Soc. of Mass

       Spectrom. 1999, 10, 521-528.    

 

 

TABLE LEGENDS

Table 1.  The robustness  of the various 5-mer strands is determined from the percent of strand intact after 10 cycles of freezing in liquid nitrogen and thawing in 65°C bath. 

Table 1.

 

                                         Percentage of Intact Oligonucleotides

Freezing/

Thawing

Cycles

 

5’ TTT TT 3’

 

5’ AAA AA 3’

 

5’ CCC CC 3’

 

5’ GGG GG 3’

 

10

 

100 %

 

         90 (+/-0.4)%

 

56 (+/-0.6)%

 

48 (+/-0.4)%

 

20

 

100 %

 

        74 (+/-0.6)%

 

32 (+/-0.8)%

 

31 (+/-0.7)%

 

30

 

100 %

 

        68 (+/-0.7)%

 

30 (+/-0.4)%

 

35 (+/-0.8)%

 

40

 

       99 (+/-0.2)%

 

       66 (+/-1.2)%

 

23 (+/-0.9)%

 

19 (+/-1.1)%

 

50

 

      98 (+/-0.2)%

 

       66 (+/-2.5)%

 

21 (+/-0.9)%

 

18 (+/-1.3)%

 

60

 

       98 (+/-0.2)%

 

         67 (+/-3.4)%

 

19 (+/-1.9)%

 

4.0 (+/-0.9)%

 

70

 

      98 (+/-0.3)%

 

         56 (+/-5.6)%

 

19 (+/-2.4)%

 

4.2 (+/-1.5)%

 

Table 2.  The robustness of the T-mer as a function of various strand length the 5-mer versus the 12-mer.
Table 2.

 

                            Percentage of Intact Oligonucleotides

STRAND

LENGTH

 

   20 cycles

 

    50 cycles

 

    70 cycles

 

    90 cycles

 

5-mer

 

100 %

 

         98 (+/-0.3)%

 

98 (+/-0.2)%

 

96 (+/-0.4)%

 

12-mer

 

    67 (+/-0.7%)

 

        55 (+/-0.9)%

 

52 (+/-0.8)%

 

40 (+/-0.8)%

 


FIGURE LEGENDS

Click here to view actual figures.

Figure 1.  MALDI mass spectra of  50 mM solution of 5’ AAA AA 3¢ acquired after 0, 20 and 70 cycles of freezing in liquid nitrogen folllowed by  thawing in 65°C bath. ATT was used as the matrix.

 

Figure 2.  MALDI mass spectra of  50 mM solution of 5’ TTT TT 3¢ acquired after 0, 20 and 70 cycles of freezing in liquid nitrogen folllowed by  thawing in 65°C bath.

 

Figure 3.  MALDI mass spctra of the strand 5¢ AAA AA 3¢ a) 50mM and b) 1mM of the strand 5¢ AAA AA 3¢ after undergoing 20 freezing/thawing cycles.

 

Figure 4.  MALDI mass spectra of the strand of a) 50mM and b) 1mM solution of 5¢GGG GGA AAA A 3¢ analyzed after 20 cycles of harsh freezing and thawing.

 

Figure 5.  MALDI mass spectra of  a) 5¢ TTT TT 3¢ and b) 5¢ TTT TTT TTT TTT 3¢ after 90 cycles of freezing/thawing conditions.

 

Figure 6.  MALDI mass spectra of a 50mM  of the mixed strands a) 5¢ GG GGG AAA AA 3¢, b) 5¢ GG GGG AAA AA 3¢ and c) 5¢ TT TTT CCC CC 3¢ after 50 cycles of decomposition.

 

Figure 7. MALDI mass spectra of the  5´ AAA AA 3’ after freezing and thawing for an eight hour period on the laboratory bench top and in the freezer.